I work in the semiconductor business, and every single project Ive worked on has had memory issues that 10-15 improvement would have helped time to market immensely or have been impossible without. If you use FreeRTOS, then Atollic TrueStudio can be an interesting environment as well.Ĭontinue this thread level 2 2 points 4 years ago Also they have a decent compiler that can create code 10-15 smaller than gcc. I would say, first setup an Eclipse based environment and work a bit, and then get a 30-day evaluation license and try for yourself. Iar Embedded Workbench Cost License And Try The compiler wants C89-compliant code, IDE is useless, RTOS tracing can be set up by other means. In my opinion, none of these reasons are compelling enough to pay for it. Thanks 30 comments share save hide report 100 Upvoted This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast Sort by best level 1 linux guy 4 points 4 years ago IAR is helpful within a few use cases, like if you can manage to setup their RTOS-aware debugger etc.Īlso they have a decent compiler that can create code 10-15 smaller than gcc. Now that Im working on my own projects, I am thinking the price tag of IAR EW is potentially worth it. It was brutally frustrating to setup as a wee lad, but I managed. Iar Embedded Workbench Cost License And TryĪre the alternatives (GCC eclipse) anything close to IAR Ive used IAR during school for projects and things (always the size limited instance in the case of larger projects I used a Blackmagic v2 probe with GCC-arm embedded tool chain, coupled with hodgepodge IDEs and compilers.
0 kommentar(er)
